How will the semifinal matches pan out? Who is likely to make it to the final in Luzhniki Stadium in Moscow next Sunday?
France vs Belgium
The French and Belgian national teams had faced off in the World Cup twice before. In 1938, with home advantage, France won 3-1 and in 1986, the only other occasion when both reached the semifinals, France won 4-2 in extra-time. Overall, Belgium beat France 30 times in 73 matches (France won 24).
In the three previous encounters this decade there have been two 0-0 draws and a 4-3 win for Belgium during friendly game in June 2015.
France is the bookies’ favorite to win the match, but don’t forget that the odds were 11-4 on Belgium to beat Brazil in the quarterfinal.
Of the two teams, Belgium is more exciting to a neutral audience. The team's previous manager Marc Wilmots kept the handbrake on at the last World Cup, and the Red Devils lost 0-1 to Argentina in the quarterfinal when they could have achieved more. As I noted in my analysis of Belgium’s chances in January, the more attack-minded manager Roberto Martinez is the perfect fit for the team.
READ MORE: Football: How to Revive the Magic of the FA Cup
Belgium scored an astonishing 43 goals in qualifying (the highest ever) and it is the top scorer in Russia with 14 goals, averaging almost three goals a game. Martinez has set his talented players free and is reaping the rewards.
The 11-5 odds for a draw in normal time look tempting, and the 11-10 odds for Belgium to reach the final don't look too bad either.
England vs Croatia
It’s England's first World Cup semifinal match since 1990 and Croatia's first since 1998.
As in the previous semifinal, a former winner of the tournament (England, in 1966) is pitched against a team who has never played in a World Cup final before. England and Croatia have only met seven times, and the Three Lions have the upper hand with four wins, having won their last two matches against Croatia by an aggregate scoreline of 9-2.
However, Croatia did record two wins against England in 2006 and 2007, which prevented their opponents from qualifying for the 2008 European Championships.
In my earlier Sputnik piece on World Cup "dark horses" I flagged up Croatia's 40-1 odds.
Their best performance in the tournament to date was their 3-0 second half demolition of Argentina in the group stage, which was really impressive. They’ve not really been as good since, but they have shown admirable durability in going the distance in both the last 16 tie with Denmark and in Saturday’s equally draining quarterfinal battle with Russia.
Luka Modric often looks out on his feet, but then he picks himself up and makes an amazing run, or as against Argentina scores a wonder goal. If we forget about the "dead rubber" game against Belgium in the group stage, Croatia will be the best team England has faced in Russia so far. To beat it, England will have to improve further, but there’s every chance it can do that. Croatia has conceded four goals so far, and none have come from teams trying to pass the ball into the net.
READ MORE: No Plans to Shift Men's Final at Wimbledon to Avoid Clash With World Cup Finale
Iceland scored from a penalty (following a handball). Denmark from a long throw. Russia scored from a long range strike and a free kick. England must try and get as many crosses in as it can — and shoot on sight. At the back, they don’t want to play too much football either, with Croatia’s crucial first goal against Argentina coming after back pass confusion between a defender and the goalkeeper. Modric closed down a Russian defender who was too relaxed on Saturday and that might have resulted in a goal attempt under different circumstances. Colombia let England off the hook when dithering on the ball nine minutes from time led to a three-on-two situation. The Croats might not be so forgiving.
England is the bookies’ favorite to win, and all things considered, you’d have to fancy them to make it to the final. But the margins are likely to be very tight.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.