NATO Invests in 'Infrastructure of New Arms Race', Russia Hones Defense Spending

© AFP 2022 / Petras MalukasA US Air Force F-22 Raptor fighter aircraft takes off at the Air Base of the Lithuanian Armed Forces in Šiauliai, Lithuania, on April 27, 2016
A US Air Force F-22 Raptor fighter aircraft takes off at the Air Base of the Lithuanian Armed Forces in Šiauliai, Lithuania, on April 27, 2016 - Sputnik International
Subscribe
US
India
Global
A NATO military buildup and an increase in its countries' defense spending are setting the stage for a potential arms race, whereas Russia's alternate policy of reducing its military budget can be seen as its way of pursuing optimization, expert Alexey Fenenko told RIA Novosti.

The NATO emblem is seen before a defence ministers meeting at the NATO headquarters in Brussels on October 22, 2013 - Sputnik International
Helpful Hints: Poland Instructs NATO on Topics of Discussion With Russia
In an interview with RIA Novosti, Alexey Fenenko,  an associate professor at Moscow State University' Faculty of World Politics, specifically pointed to NATO countries' ever-increasing military buildup and defense spending, which he said adds significantly to a new arms race.

Earlier, referring to an annual report by Jane's Defense Budget, the Financial Times said that Russia, for the first time since the 1990s, was not among the top five countries in terms of defense spending.

Russia's military spending in 2016 stands at about 48.5 billion dollars, according to the report, which also said that the 2016 defense budget of the US amounts to 622 billion dollars and tops the list.

The survey added that Western European countries' military spending grew for the first time in six years, and that the US has put an end to its military budget cuts.  For the first time since the 1990s, Russia's military budget has reduced when compared to those of other countries. 

Commenting on the matter, Alexey Fenenko drew attention to differences between Russia's defense policy and NATO's.

"Russia is pursuing a policy of optimization. It deals with concrete tasks and possibly pays less attention to developing costly systems. Namely, Russia focuses on how to block costly high-precision systems, while NATO concentrates on developing these systems," he said.

The expert also noted that the allocation of money for defense purposes is highly influenced by the so-called giant bureaucratic systems which are often involved in the embezzlement of funds.

"Huge sums are earmarked for the creation of so-called advanced weapons, which were mentioned 30-40 years ago but were never seen," he added.

Fenenko cited a whole array of expensive military projects which he said "lead to nothing."

"Although we cannot call it a new arms race, it contributes to the creation of an infrastructure for a future arms race, something that is currently happening in the West," he concluded.

Soldiers of the US Army 2nd Cavalry Regiment deployed in Estonia as a part of the US military's Operation Atlantic Resolve, arrive during the Dragoon Ride exercise in Liepupe March 22, 2015. Operation Atlantic Resolve is aimed at demonstrating commitment to NATO allies in light of Russia's aggression in Ukraine, according to the US Army. - Sputnik International
NATO 'Far Too Often Acts as an Offensive Alliance' Toward Russia
Earlier this year, a Pew Research poll revealed that just a third of NATO member states think that they should increase defense spending.

Only 32 percent of NATO countries believe that the military spending should be increased, while 47 percent want it to remain at the current level, according to the survey.

The Netherlands and Poland are the top two countries in support of the increased military spending, while Spain, Italy and Greece would like to invest less.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала