Can’t Fix the F-35? US Navy, Air Force Look Towards 6th Gen Fighter Instead
Can’t Fix the F-35? US Navy, Air Force Look Towards 6th Gen Fighter Instead
In spite of the many kinks remaining to be worked out on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the Pentagon is already looking at what comes next. 24.10.2016, Sputnik International
The author of this article, sorry, have obviously no sign of any knowledge of military development. It is not the first time here we can read such a non professional article. For you, the author, what you can't see, it doesn't necessary means that it don't/won't exist.
2
cmps309
US does have very few experienced Engineers in Aerospace. I interviewed with many big companies here. Unfortunately i don't find any exceptional Engineers here. Russia will be working on number 8 generation and USA will be stuck on sixth.Today India is better than USA. So is China. Wall street and our Goverment here give free handouts here so people here dont have to compete. IF you are an American and I mean white American you got a very good job. This is why Russia is getting ahead. America depends on foreigners. USA has lost skills in many areas. they pay a Reistered Nurse more than an Engineer here. A computer Engineeer with 3 yrs experience makes as much as 20 yrs experience in Aerospace. This place is a mess. I have no hope for USA. It is falling into a black hole.
"Rapid progress is being made in fixing 15 operational F-35A aircraft needing modifications to repair non-compliant Polyalphaolefin (PAO) coolant tubes," the aircraft’s Joint Program Office spokesman, Joe DellaVedova, told Military.com. "All 15 aircraft are expected to fly again by the end of the year."
With the latest US fifth-generation fighter barely able to stay aloft, the Pentagon is already looking toward its sixth-generation successor.
The new aircraft, already in the conceptual development stage, is slated for launch in the mid-2030s, and is being developed by the US Air Force and Navy, according to Scout Warrior.
For the Navy, the sixth-generation aircraft will replace its fleet of F/A-18 Super Hornets, which will begin to be retired by 2035.
Officials have floated lofty ideas about the technology that will be included. Stealth is obviously a major consideration, but developers also have their eyes on "smart skins." This would, in theory, mean that the fighter’s sensors and other electronic equipment would be built into the plane’s fuselage, cutting down on weight and reducing drag.
Increased autonomy is another goal. While many military experts expected the F-35 to be the last manned aircraft produced by the US, given advances in unmanned systems, it appears the Navy is unprepared to completely abandon the need for pilots.
The plane will naturally feature futuristic weapons systems. A hypersonic missile is one option, though the technology necessary for such a system does not yet exist. According to Scout Warrior, developers are also pursuing onboard lasers, as well as an electronic attack system.
While no cost estimates have been given, it’s hard to imagine the sixth-generation jet costing less than the one and a half trillion dollars required to develop and fly the beleaguered F-35. Despite that high price tag, the fifth-generation fighter has faced a number of technical hurdles.
Most recently, officials expressed concern over the F-35A’s ejector seat, which could endanger pilots weighing less than 165 pounds. The US Navy is also experiencing difficulties with the helmet of its F-35C variant, the only model not yet deemed combat-ready. Tests have shown that the ambient "green glow" of the helmet’s heads-up display is blinding pilots during night carrier landings.
"It’s not so bad on a really bright night," said Tom Briggs, acting Navy chief test engineer, according to Defense Tech.
Hopefully American engineers have learned from past mistakes.
Access to the chat has been blocked for violating the rules .
You will be able to participate again through:∞.
If you do not agree with the blocking, please use the feedback form
The discussion is closed. You can participate in the discussion within 24 hours after the publication of the article.