Registration was successful!
Please follow the link from the email sent to

Vattenfall's Lawsuit Against Germany 'Should Be a Warning Signal Against TTIP'

© Photo : PixabayNuclear power plant. (File)
Nuclear power plant. (File) - Sputnik International
In 2012, Swedish energy concern Vattenfall filed a lawsuit against the German government following Berlin's radical change of nuclear policy and refusal to produce nuclear energy. The trial into the case started in Washington last week and if successful, it could result in high expenses for Germany and its taxpayers.

A Brussels protest  rally against the TTIP agreement between the EU and the US - Sputnik International
Austria Presidential Hopeful to Sign TTIP Deal Only If Favored in Referendum
Based on the European Energy Charter Vattenfall, energy concerns have the right to submit their claims to international arbitration courts in order to resolve investment disputes. The international centre for settlement of such issues is located in Washington. It examines disputes between foreign corporations and countries in which the enterprises are represented.

Hubertus Zdebel, Bundestag deputy from Germany's Left Party, fears that the Vattenfall case could set a precedent for future similar cases and pose a serious danger to the EU's national governments, especially if the EU signs the TTIP and CETA agreements.

"In my opinion, this process will serve as a model for the arbitration bodies provided in the TTIP and CETA. This is about parallel justice taking place, the task of which is to protect concerns from the negative impact of national laws. In this case, the process should be a warning signal with regard to the conclusion of TTIP," Zdebel told Sputnik.

Vattenfall is demanding € 4.7 billion in compensation from the German government for the suspension of the work of its two nuclear power plants located in Germany in 2011. The decision came as a result of the reversal of Germany's course in the field of nuclear energy following the Fukushima disaster.

At that time, Vattenfall "was investing in new nuclear power plants" and couldn't "close its eyes" to the great losses, resulting from these changes, Vattenfall's representatives claimed.

"I believe Vattenfall has very good chances [to win the case]. The arbitral tribunal could decide that this case involves breach of trust. The energy concerns and the federal government signed an agreement on the extension of operating nuclear power plants, which is why the companies had to make serious investments. And then, all of a sudden after Fukushima, [the government] has changed its safety policy in relation to nuclear power plants and made all of them useless, with the new law prohibiting to operate them," Prof. Dr. Hans-Jorg Dederer told Sputnik.

An undated file picture shows a B-2 Spirit Bomber droping a B61-11 bomb casing from an undisclosed location - Sputnik International
World is Not Enough: US May Station Advanced Nuclear Weapons in Germany
In 2011, Germany's coalition government announced its plans to phase out all the country's nuclear power plants by 2022. German Energy corporations like E.ON, EnBW and RWE have been demanding compensation for their losses amounting to 10 billion euro, although without success.

Vattenfall's representatives are, however, confident that the trial in Washington that started last week will be successful. The final decision is set to be made in the second half of 2017.

To participate in the discussion
log in or register
Заголовок открываемого материала