This is Why Norway Cannot Replace Russia in European Gas Market

© Sputnik / Go to the photo bankLaunch of second section of Nord Stream gas pipeline
Launch of second section of Nord Stream gas pipeline - Sputnik International
Recently, Norway’s THEMA Consulting Group issued a report entitled "The role of natural gas in Europe." In particular, the report stated that Russian natural gas poses a serious environmental threat to Europe. However, many experts doubted the allegation.

An engineer checks the gas distribution system in Beregdaroc, one of several points where Russian gas crosses into the European Union February 10, 2015 - Sputnik International
US 'Putting Pressure' on Europe to Block Russian Gas Deals
Natural gas is one of the most important parts of the European Union’s energy system. Over the past year, large pipelines networks, many gas storage facilities and liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals have been built across Europe. Despite a little drop, natural gas has a 20-25 percent share in the European energy market, according to the report.

The company also predicts that the share will rise in the near future since the number of ageing coal power plants is decreasing and environmental standards are increasing.

In the coming years, Europe is likely become even more dependent on gas imports, first of all because of the depletion of its own gas fields. The EU should seek to diversify its natural gas supplies, according to the report.

According to the company’s analysts, Norway could play the role in diversification. In addition to Russia and Algeria, Norway is one of Europe’s biggest suppliers of natural gas. However, according to the report, Russian natural gas is much "dirtier" and "dangerous" for the environment.

If the EU replaces Norwegian gas with Russian gas it will significantly increase greenhouse gas emissions by up to 97 million tons according to estimates. At the same time, if Europe prioritizes Norwegian gas, emissions will be nearly 53.9 million, the report read.

Gas stove - Sputnik International
Poland Halts Gas Supplies to Ukraine After Main Pipeline Leak
As for Algerian LNG, it would increase emissions to 135 million tons, according to estimates by the consulting companies Exergia and COWI.

The report claimed that Russian gas is environmentally dangerous due to the poor condition of the Russian gas transportation system designed in the Soviet era and the large distance between the oil fields and the consumer. If the pipeline is damaged methane leaks are very dangerous for the environment.

In 2015, the European Commission said that 1.77 percent of Russian methane shipments are lost during transportation through the pipelines while Norway’s supplies lose only 0.01 percent.

Nevertheless, Abhishek Kumar, senior expert at Global Gas Analytics, questioned the report’s conclusions.

"I don’t think that referring to the European Commission’s report is a sufficient proof. A study is needed to find the real reason of those methane leaks and where they happen after natural gas crosses the Russian border," Kumar told the Russian new website

In addition, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) did not agree with the Norwegian report.

Significant differences for assessing the environmental safety of products from one or another company often stem from different evaluation methods, Alexei Knizhnikov, head of the environmental policy at the WWF, said.

"For example, according to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, methane emissions in Russia are eight times higher than estimated by Russian specialists. The reason is different indexes applied to countries depending on their level of economic development," he explained.

According to him, the UN applies developing countries indexes to Russia. In fact, greenhouse emissions while transporting gas from Russia are the same as in Europe.

A worker carries out a routine check at a natural gas control centre of Turkey's Petroleum and Pipeline Corporation, 35 km (22 miles) west of Ankara, on January 7, 2009 - Sputnik International
This is Why Europe Cannot Decrease its 'Addiction' to Russian Gas Supplies
Moreover, Nikita Golutvin, Vice Principal at the Gubkin Russian University of Oil and Gas, said that Russian pipelines comply with all European safety norms.

"It’s strange that they are concerned about the safety of our pipelines. First, the Russian pipelines were certified in Europe by the Norwegian company DNV. Second, one of Gazprom’s pipelines was built with German-made pipes. So, such claims are surprising," he said.

Norwegian political analyst and specialist in Russian affairs Bjorn Nistad underscored that the report looks biased.

"Probably, this is an attempt to pressure the European Commission over Nord Stream-2," he said.

Since it was announced, Nord Stream-2 has faced opposition from many European and United States officials who labelled the pipeline as "controversial."

The project presumes building two pipeline strings, with a total capacity of 55 billion cubic meters of gas a year, from Russia to Germany under the Baltic Sea.

Nord Stream gas pipeline launched in Germany - Sputnik International
Despite All Obstacles Europe Needs Nord Stream-2 Gas Pipeline
An agreement on Nord Stream-2, involving the expansion of the Nord Stream gas pipeline, was signed in early-September 2014, during the Eastern Economic Forum in Russia’s Vladivostok. The new consortium was established by Gazprom, E.ON, Shell, BASF/Wintershall, OMV and Engie. Last December, Gazprom said Nord Stream-2 is expected for launch in the fourth quarter of 2019.

One of the main goals of the planned pipeline is to cut reliance on Ukraine in delivering Russian gas to Europe.

Recently, Mario Mehren, Chairman of the German energy firm Wintershall, said that the Nord Stream-2 will be crucial for Europe’s energy security.

"Nord Stream-2 is a project that will maintain energy security not only in Germany but in the entire Europe. It will provide direct and cheap supplies of Russian natural gas to Europe," Mehren said in an interview with Russian online publication

Some American oil and gas experts also said that the THEMA’s report is biased and more about politics than Europe’s energy needs.

"In the light of Russia’s plan to build a new pipeline to Europe and thus increase its share in the European energy market, we would see a growing number of reports criticizing Russia’s energy policy and technologies," Robert Pattern from Energy Analytics Group told

Mehren also agreed that the situation with Nord Stream-2 is political.

"Politicians should be less emotional about the initiative because first of all Nord Stream-2 would give additional guarantees for Europe’s energy security," he said.

This is nothing more but an attempt by European officials and companies to justify their political decisions by referring to technologies, Golunov pointed out.

"If we look the quality of gas we’ll see that there are no international standards. Moreover, there are no gas fields with the same characteristics of gas. Nord Stream transports gas from Yamal fields. This gas is better than Norwegian gas," he said.

Gazprom's central office in Moscow - Sputnik International
Gas Giant to Remain in State Hands: Russia Has No Plans to Sell Gazprom
In the fourth quarter of 2014, Norway surpassed Russia in gas shipments to Western Europe. Norway delivered 31.3 billion cubic meters of gas while Russia delivered only 20.1 billion. The main reason was that some European countries stopped buying Russian gas due to political motives. For example, Lithuania signed a deal with Statoil on buying its LNG which was 10 percent more expensive than their Russian competition.

According to outlooks, the price of Norwegian gas will further rise. According to a Statoil report, production cost of one million BTUs of gas was $1.04 against $0.40 for Gazprom in 2015.

Another problem is that in order to be leader in the European market, Norwegian companies will have to explore new gas fields.

To participate in the discussion
log in or register
Заголовок открываемого материала