If Kiev Invokes Martial Law, It Won't Be Because of Any 'Russian Threat'

President Petro Poroshenko has warned that Kiev may be forced to introduce martial law if the deterioration of the situation in eastern Ukraine and the standoff with Russia over Crimea continues. Offering their thoughts, Ukrainian political scientists suggested that if Kiev does introduce martial law, it won't be because of any threat from Russia.

Speaking to media during a visit to the Western Ukrainian region of Lvov on Thursday, Poroshenko warned that the threat of an armed escalation in the diplomatic conflict with Moscow was considerable, adding that "we cannot rule out a full-scale Russian invasion." 

Accordingly, Poroshenko noted that "the deterioration of the situation in the east and in Crimea does not exclude the possibility that in the event of further escalation, we will be forced to impose martial law and declare mobilization."

Tensions between Moscow and Kiev escalated dramatically earlier this month, after Ukrainian saboteurs were discovered preparing attacks against crucial elements of Crimea's infrastructure. Russian security forces' attempts to capture the men resulted in the deaths of a Federal Security Service officer and a Russian serviceman, prompting outrage in Moscow. On August 11, Poroshenko put Ukrainian military forces on the border with Crimea and in the Donbass on high alert. This provoked a corresponding response from the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic, whose leadership said that they could not rule out "provocations" from Kiev forces in near future.

Commenting on the president's remarks, Ukrainian journalist Dmitri Galkin told the independent Russian online newspaper Svobodnaya Pressa that factually, they have nothing to do with any so-called 'Russian threat'.

"The Ukrainian government fears a surge in protest activity in the fall," the analyst noted. "For a long time, the growth of social protest was constrained by fears within Ukrainian society associated with a Russian invasion. Now, this fear has gradually begun to subside, and with it the country's social problems have once again come to the foreground among the public."

"Therefore," Galkin noted, "the authorities would like Ukrainians to believe in the real possibility of a military confrontation with Russia. This is the only way for the president to strengthen his position."

Asked whether Ukraine really faces the threat of martial law, the political analyst suggested that ultimately, "everything depends on what it is Ukrainian authorities fear more: growing public discontent or growing irritation in Washington and Brussels" from Kiev's benefactors. "If the fear of mass protests outweighs the latter, the government can decide to impose martial law. However, in my opinion, this is still unlikely."

Ultimately, Galkin warned that Ukraine's leaders presently find it absolutely vital to make it seem that Russia is preparing to invade the country. "Obviously, this will require an escalation of tensions in the Donbass. Moreover, Poroshenko does not need to hold on to a war footing for very long. He needs to bring down the growing social protest, and for this it is necessary to make protest activity impossible for two-three months. After that, it can be declared that thanks to the decisive actions of the authorities, it was possible to prevent Russia from implementing its aggressive plans."

Still, the analyst also noted that the introduction of martial law would disrupt the Minsk peace process, causing resentment among Kiev's Western benefactors, and "dramatically enhancing Russia's foreign policy positions. Poroshenko knows this, and therefore there are serious reasons to doubt that things will move beyond propagandistic statements designed to intimidate Ukrainian society."

For his part, Ukrainian political scientist Alexander Dudchak suggested that Poroshenko's comments amount to political "panic."

"Time is not on the side of Ukrainian authorities. They have had zero successes. None of the promises made during the Maidan 'revolution' have been fulfilled; Crimea left, the Donbass was lost; the economy is in ruins. The war in the Donbass has led to material losses for Europe. The West's interest in Ukraine has declined dramatically. No one wants to assist the country even with loans. Debts must be repaid."

Effectively, Dudchak too suggested that while Poroshenko may temporarily benefit from the imposition of martial law, he has to realize "that such a decision will radically narrow his opportunities for political maneuver."

Ultimately, the analyst emphasized that for war to be averted, its possible instigators have to be convinced that there are no prospects for it to succeed. "In the present case, Poroshenko understands that there are no prospects, but his curators would be satisfied simply with the fact of a war breaking out between Ukraine and Russia. After all, the task of pulling the Russian army into the war has failed thus far. And it will not happen, because Russia is fully capable of stopping any aggression at the border, preventing the invasion of its territory, and crushing any military grouping on its borders."

"It's sad that for the sake of their own selfish interests, the leadership in Kiev is willing to put the lives of thousands of their fellow citizens at risk," Dudchak concluded.