- Sputnik International
World
Get the latest news from around the world, live coverage, off-beat stories, features and analysis.

Nuclear Weapons Irrelevant in Context of Security Challenges Faced by UK

© AFP 2023 / DANIEL LEAL-OLIVASDemonstrators hold placards as they attend an anti-war and anti-trident demonstration near the Houses of Parliament in central London on July 18, 2016
Demonstrators hold placards as they attend an anti-war and anti-trident demonstration near the Houses of Parliament in central London on July 18, 2016 - Sputnik International
Subscribe
Nuclear weapons do not protect against terrorism, they don’t provide deterrence to any of the security challenges that the UK faces, according to Green Party Peace and Defense spokeswoman Rebecca Johnson.

Trident Nuclear Submarine, HMS Victorious, on patrol off the west coast of Scotland - Sputnik International
British Parliament Votes to Renew Trident Nuclear Arms Program
MOSCOW (Sputnik) — Renewing the Trident nuclear deterrent system will not help the United Kingdom tackle the modern security challenges the country is facing, such as the threat of terrorism, Green Party Peace and Defense spokeswoman Rebecca Johnson told Sputnik Tuesday.

"Nuclear weapons do not protect against terrorism, they don’t provide deterrence to any of the security challenges that the UK faces. So again, it is an application of a completely inappropriate theory of 1950 cold war deterrence to situation where Britain faces a whole range of security challenges for which nuclear weapons are utterly irrelevant," Johnson said.

On Monday, UK parliamentarians in the House of Commons voted in favor of renewing the United Kingdom’s nuclear deterrent program with four new Vanguard-class nuclear submarines.

Johnson said that the theory of nuclear deterrence was developed in the 1950s to justify spending large sums of money on the nuclear arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union. This deterrence was supposed to reassure people that the weapons would stop a war rather than lead to a new one.

"But in the real world, post-Cold War this is not how the deterrence could possibly work," she said, stressing that former US State Secretary Henry Kissinger and former US Defense Secretary Robert McNamara clearly recognized that relying on nuclear weapons for deterrence is increasingly hazardous and decreasingly effective.

"For the British, they are still clinging to this idea despite the fact that having nuclear weapons since 1952 has not prevented us going into wars, it has not prevented wars like the Falklands, having nuclear weapons didn’t stop Russia losing its war in Afghanistan and it did not prevent the US losing its war in Vietnam," Johnson said.

House of Parliament - Sputnik International
Protest Outside UK Parl't Amid Trident Nuclear Deterrent Debates
The Trident system is deployed at the UK Royal Navy’s Faslane submarine base in Scotland. The UK Conservative Party has been campaigning to renew the nuclear deterrent despite rising maintenance costs.

The total estimated cost of renewing Trident is 167 billion pounds ($244 billion) over the 32-year lifespan of the system, between 2028 and 2060, according to the International Monetary Fund.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала