Registration was successful!
Please follow the link from the email sent to

Why Bulgaria Ruined NATO's Black Sea Plans (No, Kremlin's Not to Blame)

© AP Photo / Vadim GhirdaTurkish NATO warship TCG Turgutreis, foreground, maneuvers on the Black Sea after leaving the port of Constanta, Romania, Monday, March 16, 2015.
Turkish NATO warship TCG Turgutreis, foreground, maneuvers on the Black Sea after leaving the port of Constanta, Romania, Monday, March 16, 2015. - Sputnik International
Subscribe
Some find it hard to believe that the Kremlin was not involved in Bulgaria's decision not to take part in NATO's initiative aimed at creating a permanent naval task force to counter Russia in the Black Sea, yet this is exactly what happened, analyst Maxim Samorukov asserted.

"Surely, it is easier to explain Bulgaria's unpredictability by invoking Russian energy blackmailing, implicit pressure, a bribe or other scary KGB tricks," the deputy editor of Carnegie.ru noted.

This explanation is "psychologically convenient," he said, but in this case it is an incorrect one. "Without any Russian pressure involved, many countries on NATO's eastern flank are unreliable; they do not trust each other and have grudges against the West."

The bloc's Black Sea naval force was meant to be one of the key measures aimed at containing Russia. These include the already tested and mission ready "Spearhead Force," as well as four battle groups that are expected to be deployed in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland in 2017.

© AFP 2021 / DANIEL MIHAILESCURomanian frigate "Regina Maria" personnel with the NATO Standing Maritime Group-2 keep watch during a military drill on the Black Sea, 60km from Constanta city March 16, 2015
Romanian frigate Regina Maria personnel with the NATO Standing Maritime Group-2 keep watch during a military drill on the Black Sea, 60km from Constanta city March 16, 2015 - Sputnik International
Romanian frigate "Regina Maria" personnel with the NATO Standing Maritime Group-2 keep watch during a military drill on the Black Sea, 60km from Constanta city March 16, 2015

Legal constraints

War ships of the NATO Standing Maritime Group-2 take part in a military drill on the Black Sea, 60km from Constanta city March 16, 2015 - Sputnik International
Why Competition Between NATO, Russia in Black Sea is Likely to Ramp Up
The 1936 Montreux Convention Regarding the Regime of the Straits prevents any non-Black Sea nation from permanently stationing its naval forces in the Black Sea, limiting their presence to not more than 21 days. For this reason, only three NATO members, Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey, could have taken part in creating the bloc's permanent fleet in the region.

NATO's leadership welcomed the initiative, spearheaded by Romania. Representatives from the three countries are said to have discussed the issue for months and the talks appeared to be fruitful until Bulgaria dropped out of the project.

"I do not need a war in the Black Sea," Bulgaria's Prime Minister Boyko Borisov said on June 16. "To send warships as a fleet against the Russian ships exceeds the limit of what I can allow," he added.

© Sputnik / Grigoriy Sisoev / Go to the photo bankThe Moskva guided missile cruiser, the flagship of Russia's Black Sea Fleet
The Moskva guided missile cruiser, the flagship of Russia's Black Sea Fleet - Sputnik International
The Moskva guided missile cruiser, the flagship of Russia's Black Sea Fleet

The Kremlin's hand

Bulgaria's Prime Minister Boyko Borisov is the furthest one can get from being the Kremlin's puppet. In fact, he is one of the most anti-Russian politicians in the country's political elite. Borisov's track record definitely proves this. While in power, he has managed to "bury all major bilateral projects" with Russia, the analyst said.

"If the Kremlin can easily force Borisov to make all the right choices, then why did not Moscow do anything when [the Bulgarian prime minister] pulled the plug on the Burgas–Alexandroupoli pipeline project? Or the Belene Nuclear Power Plant and the South Stream projects?" Samorukov asked.
The real reason why NATO's Black Sea initiative came to an end has nothing to do with Moscow.

"There was no irresistible pressure from the Kremlin. The plan to create a permanent fleet fell through due to internal reasons, which are typical not only for Bulgaria, but many other NATO members in Eastern Europe," the analyst noted.

U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer USS Porter sets sail in the Bosphorus, on its way to the Black Sea in Istanbul. - Sputnik International
In the Face of Russian Warnings, US Says It Will Remain in Black Sea
Samorukov mentioned two major reasons why Bulgaria decided to bypass the project. On the one hand, Sofia is wary of Turkey's foreign policy, on the other, Bulgaria's leadership has received virtually no assistance from the West for dropping lucrative bilateral initiatives with Russia.

On the same day as Borisov announced that Bulgaria was not interested in creating NATO's naval task force in the Black Sea, the International Court of Arbitration at the International Chamber of Commerce in Geneva ruled that Bulgaria must pay $700 million in compensation for cancelling the Belene NPP project. Yielding to Western pressure turned out to be a very costly affair for Sofia.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала