Registration was successful!
Please follow the link from the email sent to

All About Russia After All: Washington’s Vow of No New Arms Race Exposed

© AP Photo / Charlie RiedelGerman Left Party Criticizes US Nuclear Weapons’ Deployment
German Left Party Criticizes US Nuclear Weapons’ Deployment - Sputnik International
Subscribe
While the Obama administration insists that its $1 trillion plan to upgrade America’s nuclear weapon stockpiles is not in any way aimed at deterring Russian “aggression,” language in the new defense budget proves otherwise.

The nuclear non-proliferation treaty – agreed to by both the US and Russia – calls on all signatories to further the goal of nuclear disarmament.

A deactivated Titan II nuclear ICMB - Sputnik International
On the Brink of New Arms Race: Obama's Nuclear Plans Make No Sense

The Obama administration, however, has found a loophole in the agreement, and plans to funnel nearly $1 trillion into upgrading America’s nuclear arsenal. While these improvements include modifying nuclear-equipped ballistic missiles to make them more accurate, and installing adjustable yields to make nuclear bombs more practical, the US maintains the moves are aimed at sustaining current stockpiles, and are not, technically, upgrades.

It sounds to some a lot like Washington reigniting an old-fashioned Cold War arms race, but the Pentagon insists that this isn’t the case.

"The Cold War playbook…is not suitable for the 21st century," US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter told NATO allies last year, according to the Intercept.

But according to the Obama administration’s new defense budget, the US nuclear modernization is explicitly meant to deter Russian "aggression."

"We are countering Russia’s aggressive policies through investments in a broad range of capabilities…[including] our nuclear arsenal," the budget reads.

An US Air Force soldier patrol the perimetre around a F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter jet - Sputnik International
US Air Force to Receive $28Bln Over Five Years for Nuclear Deterrence

This falls in line with statements made by Brian McKeon, the principal deputy undersecretary of defense for policy, in December 2015.

"We are investing in the technologies that are most relevant to Russia’s provocations…to both deter nuclear attacks and reassure our allies."

Those "provocations" refer to Russia’s alleged invasion of Ukraine, an assertion that Russia has repeatedly denied and for which the United States has provided no evidence. US officials also cited Russia’s "invasion" of Crimea, ignoring the fact that the peninsula voted to rejoin Russia in a referendum in which over 96% of the local citizenry approved.

The plan has received fierce criticism from those concerned that the US is pushing the world toward nuclear war.

A B-52 Stratofortress is refueled in-flight over the Pacific Ocean. - Sputnik International
Delaying US Nuclear Modernization Creates Unacceptable Strategic Risk

"The United States is on the cusp of launching an unnecessary, expensive, and potentially dangerous plan to modernize its strategic nuclear forces, helping stimulate what is being called a 'new nuclear arms race,'" Professor Gordon Adams and Richard Sokolsky writes for Defense One.

"The United States can deter any country from using nuclear weapons against America and its treaty allies with a nuclear force that is far smaller, less destabilizing, and less expensive than the one the Pentagon is planning to build."

Criticism is unlikely to derail the project at this point. Most of the contracts have already been signed, including an estimated $100 billion deal with Northrop Grumman to develop the Pentagon’s new long-range bomber, designed to deliver a nuclear payload.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала