Russian Bomber Jet Posed No Threat to Turkey, So Why Shoot it Down?

© Sputnik / Dmitriy Vinogradov / Go to the photo bankRussian military aviation at Khmeimim airbase in Syria
Russian military aviation at Khmeimim airbase in Syria - Sputnik International
Subscribe
US
India
Global
Shooting down a plane on suspicion of an airspace violation is a very extreme and strange measure, and particularly unjustified given that Russia showed no aggression towards Turkey, a legal expert told RIA Novosti.

Su-24 - Sputnik International
One of Su-24 Pilots Shot Parachuting to the Ground
Airspace violations are a common enough occurrence and in a military context are usually dealt with by a special commission; shooting down an aircraft is a very extreme measure, legal expert Anatoly Kapustin told RIA Novosti on Tuesday.

"Russia's actions in this situation cannot in any way be said to be hostile to Turkey," said Kapustin, President of the Russian Association of International Law.

"Even if the Russian plane flew into Turkish airspace and returned to Syria, it needs to be taken into account that the Russian air force is taking part in an armed conflict in Syrian territory, on the side of the central government."

"We are factually and legally participants in that conflict, that is, subject to the Geneva conventions and protocols."

Russia's Su-24M Fencer bomber jet evidently posed no danger to Turkey, even if it had crossed into its airspace, making Turkey's action all the more unreasonable, said Kapustin.

"That Turkey, as is being said, used a weapon, that is quite strange, even in the context of an armed conflict – to shoot a plane above your territory, which has not taken any threatening actions, is a very harsh measure to stop an airspace violation."

Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with Jordanian King Abdullah II in the Bocharov Ruchei residence in the Black Sea resort of Sochi, Russia, Tuesday, Nov. 24, 2015 - Sputnik International
#StabInTheBack: Social Media Shares Russian President's Outrage Over Su-24
Specific processes are usually followed in the case of an airspace violation, which is a relatively common occurrence, said Kapustin.

"Incidents happen all the time, there are loads of these situations, not only in zones of conflict, but in ordinary border situations."

"As a rule, all incidents of a military kind, using military force, are resolved by a special commission, which establishes the facts, checks documents, and then makes a decision about who is at fault and to what extent they must pay damages."

"That is the usual scheme for this kind of situation," said Kapustin, adding that if those involved cannot come to agreement on the facts, then "the parties may hand over the case to a third party, who will decide who is right and wrong."

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала