- Sputnik International
World
Get the latest news from around the world, live coverage, off-beat stories, features and analysis.

Obama’s Failed ‘Non-Strategy’ in MidEast Has Fallen Into Ruins

© AP Photo / Marko DrobnjakovicPilots onboard of the US Marine fighter jet aircrafthave flown missions into both Iraq and Syria, part of the over 6,800 airstrikes carried out since August 2014.
Pilots onboard of the US Marine fighter jet aircrafthave flown missions into both Iraq and Syria, part of the over 6,800 airstrikes carried out since August 2014. - Sputnik International
Subscribe
More than a year ago US President Barack Obama announced that Washington launched a new strategy to degrade and destroy ISIL in Iraq and Syria.

That was a four-step plan that among others included a systemic campaign of airstrikes, more counterterrorism measures and increased support to forces fighting ISIL in the region.

However, according to former CIA analyst Fred Fleitz, Obama’s strategy has now completely fallen into ruins.

In his latest op-ed article titled “What now? How to deal with the utter collapse of Obama’s Syria-Iraq strategy?”  Fleitz states that Obama’s strategy has failed so quickly, because it has actually been “a non-strategy”.

In other words, the author explains, the US President chose to do as little as possible about the crisis, so he could hand this mess to a future president.

And even if Obama wanted to change his approach now, Russia’s recent involvement in the Syrian conflict have left him with fewer chances to do so.

Fred Fleitz, author of the report, the former CIA analyst and senior vice president for policy and programs with the Center for Security Policy, spoke to Sputnik in an exclusive interview.

“First of all I think the president underestimated the seriousness of the situation. He never recognized ISIL as a worldwide global threat. Obama also wanted to be the anti-Bush who did not get the United States in new military conflict. It has really tied his hands.”

The analyst went on to say that Obama came up with the policy to fight ISIL only after videos of Americans being beheaded by the militants were seen. He wanted to be seen doing something where in reality he was doing as little as possible.

In this Oct. 22, 2014, file photo, thick smoke from an airstrike by the US-led coalition rises in Kobani, Syria, as seen from a hilltop on the outskirts of Suruc, at the Turkey-Syria border - Sputnik International
Russia
US Spent a Year Bombing Syrian Desert, Not ISIL – Russian MP
According to him there was a tight restriction stopping the US army from taking more concrete action against ISIL. He called it “a non-strategy.” He also mentioned that he feels that Obama’s views have a radical bend in its philosophy.

Talking about Russia’s fight in Syria against terrorism, Fleitz said, “I think it is a game changer as Russia is filling a vacuum created by the non-policy of the US.”

Fleitz further talked about Russia’s action in Syria and what implications will this have on the future of the Middle East.

The US foreign policy changes every three to four years. It is hard to maintain a relationship with the US because new people come into the office and there is yet again a policy change. The countries that were US allies either get their funding cut or stop being considered US allies.

Talking about such US policy inside the Middle East and it having an effect on foreign policy, the analyst said, “There have been significant problems in the transition between Bush and Obama administration. I would like to see more consistent transition in US foreign policy between the administrations otherwise we will have problems.”

He goes on to discuss the repercussions of the US’ bad policy and the future of Russia and the US relations.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала