Registration was successful!
Please follow the link from the email sent to

Libyan Crisis: Who Will Fall Victim to US 'Humanitarian' Intervention Next?

© AP Photo / Mohammed el-SheikhyThe decrepit state of Libya today is largely a result of the NATO-led war that was launched in 2011. It is currently in the throes of a massive terrorist-on-terrorist war in Tripoli and Benghazi
The decrepit state of Libya today is largely a result of the NATO-led war that was launched in 2011.  It is currently in the throes of a massive terrorist-on-terrorist war in Tripoli and Benghazi - Sputnik International
After US-NATO forces have bombed Libya into bedlam the question remains open who will fall victim to Washington's "humanitarian" mission next, expert in political and military affairs Brian Cloughley asks.

NATO's saber-rattling and muscle-flexing anywhere in the world always looks like a bad omen since the Alliance has never learnt from its mistakes.

NATO's military campaign in Libya has led to a humanitarian catastrophe of epic proportions, however, Washington is unwilling to admit that it was a grave mistake for the US to topple Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

"US-NATO's three billion dollar jamboree of aerial destruction that reduced Libya to bedlam was described by the West as a military triumph, and hailed in 2012 by two prominent US-NATO military figures [Ivo H. Daalder and Admiral James G. Stravridis] as demonstrating that 'by any measure, NATO succeeded in Libya'," author and expert in political and military affair Brian Cloughley underscored in his article for Strategic Culture Foundation.

Muammar Gaddafi - Sputnik International
Gaddafi's Grim Prophecy Comes True: Countless Refugees Swarm Europe
Although NATO has "succeeded," it is at the same time undeniable that the havoc in Libya, torn apart by civil war and Islamist insurgency, will continue, Cloughley noted, citing rightist Washington think tank and intelligence company Stratfor.

So what did the NATO chiefs mean by saying that "NATO succeeded in Libya"?

Indeed, under Gaddafi Libya was hardly a paradise, the expert noted. On the other hand, the Libyan leader "did a great deal for his country" and had long been supported by the US and Britain, Cloughley emphasized.

According to the World Health Organization's (WHO) report, before the uprising Libya was "providing comprehensive health care including preventive, curative and rehabilitative services to all citizens free of charge through primary health care units, health centers and district hospitals."

The CIA Factbook read that Gaddafi's Libya boasted a literacy rate of 94.2 percent (higher than in Malaysia, Mexico and Saudi Arabia). Its life expectancy was 72.3 years, one of the highest in the developing world, the expert noted.

Despite Libya's high achievements, Gaddafi suddenly "fell out of favor" with Washington and NATO, which decided to support rebel groups and launch airstrikes against the country's government forces.

"The total turnaround in the West's attitude had of course nothing to do with the fact that Gaddafi had hinted at nationalizing his country's oil resources, thus removing profits from Western oil conglomerates," the author remarked with a touch of sarcasm.

Libyan leader Col. Moammar Gadhafi, at right, with Britain's Prime Minister Tony Blair as they meet outside Tripoli, in Libya, Thursday, March, 25, 2004. - Sputnik International
Blair to Gaddafi: I Just Called to Say... 'Find a Safe Place'
Ironically, during their inglorious war against Libya, US President Obama and British Prime Minister Cameron declared: "we are convinced that better times lie ahead for the people of Libya," the expert noted, adding that it was a "spectacularly dim-witted and ill-informed prediction."

Citing the WHO, Cloughley pointed out that the results of the US-NATO bombing in Libya included "shortages of food, fuel, water, medical supplies and electricity, as well as reduced access to health care and public services… The situation of women and children has become particularly vulnerable, since the hospitals are overwhelmed with trauma patients."

The country still remains in ruins after NATO's "triumph."

"And what is next for NATO? Where will it choose to mount another "model intervention" after its destruction of Libya and its humiliating defeat in Afghanistan?" Cloughley asks rhetorically.

To participate in the discussion
log in or register
Заголовок открываемого материала