Ron Paul: Who Profits From America's New Militarism?

© Flickr / Gage SkidmoreRon Paul speaking in Nevada in 2011.
Ron Paul speaking in Nevada in 2011. - Sputnik International
Former United States Congressman Ron Paul accused military contractors and think tanks of manufacturing potential threats around the world in an effort to spur military spending and profit from the "new Cold War."

In a column posted to his website on Sunday, Paul says the plan seems to be paying off for contractors and think tanks, as governments around the world are investing more and more into their military.

Ron Paul addresses supporters in Arizona. - Sputnik International
Ron Paul: IRS and Congress Hold Americans’ Liberty ‘In Contempt’

"The new 'threats' that are being hyped bring big profits to military contractors and the network of think tanks they pay to produce pro-war propaganda," he writes.

The former presidential candidate called out Germany, which announced last week that it would purchase 100 "Leopard" tanks. The purchase bucks a trend for a country that had greatly reduced its tank inventory since the end of the Cold War, but now sees a potential foe in Russia.

"Never mind that Russia has neither invaded nor threatened any country in the region, much less a NATO member country," Paul writes.

Paul also noted that since 2013, the Pentagon has awarded contracts worth more than $850 million for work related to Cheyenne Mountain, the Cold War-era nuclear bunker under a mountain in Colorado. Last month, the Pentagon awarded American defense firm Raytheon a $700-million contract to install new equipment inside the bunker.

Ron Paul speaking in Reno in 2011. - Sputnik International
Ron Paul: IMF Policies on Ukraine are Irresponsible

"Raytheon is a major financial sponsor of think tanks like the Institute for the Study of War, which continuously churn out pro-war propaganda," Paul writes. "I am sure these big contracts are a good return on that investment."

NATO – which Paul believes "should have been shut down after the Cold War ended" – also will be the recipient of an upgrade. The Alliance commissioned a new headquarters building in Brussels, Belgium, in 2010.

On top of resembling a "hideous claw," according to Paul, the final cost will exceed $1 billion – more than twice what was originally budgeted.

"What a boondoggle!" Paul fumes. “Is it any surprise that NATO bureaucrats and generals continuously try to terrify us with tales of the new Russian threat? They need to justify their expansion plans!"

And while it may seem that countries like Russia, Iran and Cuba are adversaries, the real enemy, Paul writes, is the taxpayer, middle class and the productive sectors of the economy, which suffer the most from runaway military spending.

Paul dismisses as a “dangerous myth” the belief that military spending benefits the economy. Instead, it benefits a "thin layer of well-connected and well-paid elites," and diverts scarce resources from the public that most needs them and uses them to manufacture war machines.

"The elites are terrified that peace may finally break out, which will be bad for their profits," Paul writes. "That is why they are trying to scuttle the Iran deal, nix the Cuba thaw, and drum up a new ‘Red Scare’ coming from Moscow. We must not be fooled into believing their lies."

To participate in the discussion
log in or register
Заголовок открываемого материала