Registration was successful!
Please follow the link from the email sent to

Due West: The tale of two Russias

© Photo : KommersantKonstantin von Eggert
Konstantin von Eggert - Sputnik International
Subscribe
“Uniformed police presence discourages troublemakers,” “Get the monitors and journalists’ cell phone numbers and ensure a constant stream of calls to them,” “Ask the monitors to leave on any pretext,” and finally “Keep a table set all the time with a supply of tea and alcohol.”

“Uniformed police presence discourages troublemakers,” “Get the monitors and journalists’ cell phone numbers and ensure a constant stream of calls to them,” “Ask the monitors to leave on any pretext,” and finally “Keep a table set all the time with a supply of tea and alcohol.”

These bizarre recommendations in writing came arrived at Kommersant FM, the radio station I work for in Moscow. They were written for the staff of one of the district electoral commissions in the Russian capital in the run-up to the State Duma elections, which are to be held on December 4th. Election monitors from political parties and journalists who, according to Russian law adopted in the 1990s, have free access at any venue during the voting and counting are viewed by the commissions, i.e. the authorities themselves, as “troublemakers” to be prevented from doing what they are supposed to do: ensuring a transparent, fair and free election process.

Interestingly, the authorities did not even react to my radio’s revelations despite the fact that even issuing such and instruction is a gross violation of the constitution. And even if a member of the district electoral commission is caught red-handed implementing the recommendations, I cited, he or she would be … just fined an equivalent of $50. That’s a pretty good deal for rigging Russia’s basic law.

Russia’s general elections campaign is entering its last hours. It is clear by now that the results will be massively rigged by the authorities to ensure that United Russia gets on top with a massive majority in the Duma, possibly a two-thirds domination that ensures the ability to change the constitution. The party is being nominally led into electoral battle by President Dmitry Medvedev, but it has nominated Vladimir Putin as its presidential candidate in the 2012 election. Everyone in Russia knows it is Putin’s party. It boasts of wide-ranging support among the population but it has to resort to dirty tricks like the ones I described. So is Russia standing still and does it want stability? Or is it restless and wants change?

Actually it acts both ways. All opinion polls, even those conducted by the state pollsters, show growing dissatisfaction with authorities in the big cities, especially those with a population of one million or more. And at the same time the same polls show that Putin’s United Russia can be certain of a vote of anything in between 30 and 40 percent or even higher in towns with a population of under half a million and in the rural areas.

What we are witnessing is an unfolding story of two Russias: one urban, not necessarily well-educated but industrious and appreciating knowledge, internet-connected, probably uncertain of what it wants but definitely tired of the enforced “Putin consensus” of the last ten-twelve years. These people are not the perfect middle class liberals of the future. They are the irritated products of the oil boom that collapsed, looking for a meaning to their lives. They do not have a political force to represent them (unless you consider the Kremlin-manipulated “Right Cause” party a real product, which few people do). These 30-40-somethings are always ready to do anything or vote for anyone who will eject them from the conformity and corruption of Putin’s stability. They are active people in search of a meaning to their lives.

Another Russia is the country of … you expect me to say that it is a land of pensioners, small-time civil servants and army officers that expect the ‘Putinistas’ to give them an extra 1,000 rubles to their pensions or salaries, longing for the Soviet-era greatness, resentful of the “chaos” of the 1990s? Yes, they are. But they are much more than that. These people are instinctively suspicious of any change. They worship the state’s power because they have none of their own. They dislike Moscow and St. Petersburg “burgers” because they never managed to make it to the shining lights of the metropolises. They know that things may not be right under what could be rightly termed Russia’s “ancient regime.” But they prefer it to a change that will be lead by those that “made it” in life, as opposed to themselves who did not.

Anti-Western sentiment plays a role here. More than a decade of relentless government propaganda left their mark. It portrays the West in general, and the United States and NATO in particular, as eternal enemies of Russia, from whom only Putin and his sidekick from United Russia are the only defense. These sentiments are pretty much widely spread even among those who do not count themselves among the fans of the prime minister. Quite a lot of the opposition to the Kremlin comes from those who claim that Putin was not anti-Western or anti-American enough. It suffices to look at the adoration that the radical-left and nationalist Other Russia movement, led by the writer and self-proclaimed guru Eduard Limonov, gets from a supposedly intellectual and sophisticated Moscow society. The Russian society is mixed up and confused. But it is also definitely divided and restless.

The December 4th Duma elections as well as the March presidential ones will be the last ones the Kremlin will be able to control. I am certain that next comes a period of growing unrest and confusion, in which the two Russias I described will be jostling to control the future of the country. Predictions here are a messy and risky business, but I’d venture one: stability, that in Russia was precarious even in the best of times, is over.

 

The views expressed in this article are the author’s and may not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

Due West: Should Russia rethink its Kosovo policy?

Due West: Who would have thought it’d be Moscow vs the Arabs?

Due West: Ukraine Still At The Crossroads

Due West: “Radical chic” Russian style

Due West: Will Obama's reset policy survive?

Due West: Which way will Russia go on the WTO?

Due West: Yanukovych’s mistake

Due West: Is Russia losing interest in WTO bid?

Due West: Business as usual under Putin - again?

Due West: The Kremlin vs. Yukos

Due West: As U.S. commemorates 9/11, Kremlin looks the other way

Due West: The rules of the oil game in Russia

Due West: Russia’s missed opportunity in Libya

Due West: Moscow's tortuous foreign policy

Due West: Hashing it out three years on - Russia-Georgia relations

Due West: Arab summer

Due West: Russian Nazis look to Norway

Due West: Sailing out of corruption

Due West: Medvedev should visit the graves of those who gave Russia true freedom

Due West: Otto of Austria - the uncrowned Emperor of Europe

Due West: Moscow and Minsk start a cold war, while China waits in the wings

Due West: Ukraine Turns Gaze Back to Brussels

Due West: Russia divided in wake of a murderer’s death

Due West: Long live the King!

Due West: Russia’s Balkans obsession seems to be finally over

Due West: Laying the table for Obama and Medvedev

Due West: Russia’s Two-Faced Approach to Foreign Policy

Due West: VE-Day Truths and Lies

Due West: George W. Bush has the last laugh

Due West: Wake up, it’s a new world Mr. Prime Minister

Due West: Putin vs. Medvedev

Due West: East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet

Due West: The Kuchma sensation

Due West: More Putin-Medvedev cat and mouse?

Due West: Send in the Sukhois

Due West: Russia’s Romance with conspiracy theories

Due West: Good-bye to a colonel and his Socialist People’s Republic

Due West: Was George W. Bush right on Arab democracy?

Due West: And What about Syria?

Due West: Boris Yeltsin - Russia's flawed but genuine revolutionary

Due West: Pointing fingers instead of pulling levers

Due West: The times they are a-changing – should secular Arabs fear democracy?

Due West: EU ready to sell out to Beijing

Due West: Not to be missed – two anniversaries in 2011

Due West: Hotspots and weak spots around the world in 2010

Due West: Lukashenko as Europe’s number one psychologist

Due West: Vaclav Havel – the man, who still believes in politics

Due West: Georgia’s wildcard in Russia’s WTO membership

Due West: The tabloid freedom of WikiLeaks

Due West: Russia prepared to go as far as NATO is prepared

Due West: Looking into the Russian-Japanese island spat

Due West: Russia's NATO Dream

*

What is Russia's place in this world? Unashamed and unreconstructed Atlanticist, Konstantin von Eggert believes his country to be part and parcel of the "global West." And while this is a minority view in Russia, the author is prepared to fight from his corner.

Konstantin Eggert is a commentator and host for radio Kommersant FM, Russia's first 24-hour news station. In the 1990s he was Diplomatic Correspondent for “Izvestia” and later the BBC Russian Service Moscow Bureau Editor. Konstantin has also spent some time working as ExxonMobil Vice-President in Russia. He was made Honorary Member of the Order of the British Empire by Queen Elizabeth II.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала