06:58 GMT +3 hours27 June 2016
Live
Стенд канала Russia Today

US Propaganda Push Against Russia May Shred Basic Constitutional Freedoms

© Sputnik/ Ilya Pitalev
Russia
Get short URL
273580344

In an Orwellian Twist of Fate, two US senators drop legislation calling for the creation of a propaganda agency tasked with “delegitimizing” Russian and Chinese media, and “strategically” presenting “facts” to support US interests. Critics slam the bill as “extreme,” adding that it likely violates the US First Amendment.

On Thursday, US Senators Rob Portman (R-OH) and Chris Murphy (D-CT) introduced bipartisan legislation titled "The Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act." The bill targets specifically the growing visibility of the popular RT (Russia Today) and CCTV (China Central Television) stations by calling for increased appropriations to the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), which already receives $768 million per year under the current budget, and developing a new agency under the command of the State Department.

Portman, the bill’s lead sponsor, said in a speech Thursday before the Atlantic Council think tank that the purpose of the bill is to "delegitimize" alternative news sources such as RT and CCTV. In making the argument for the necessity of the measure, Portman claimed that RT spends $400 million on its Washington Bureau alone, a position that RT representatives adamantly deny and that is a direct contradiction with previous reports from Western media and analysts. 

What Does "The Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act" Do?

Portman opened his remarks by noting that March 18 "marks the second anniversary of Russia’s annexation of Crimea and subsequent military intervention in eastern Ukraine." Apart from mischaracterizing the reunification of Ukraine with Russia — the result of a referendum in which 97% of Crimeans voted for the move — and reiterating baseless claims of Russian military actions in that country, the Senator argued that these actions "exposed and intensified a broader struggle over the future of Central and Eastern Europe, the future of NATO, and of the rules-based, American-led international community."

In response to a perceived threat of Russian aggression against NATO interests, dismissed months ago by Russian President Vladimir Putin as "the kind of thing that only crazy people think and only when they are dreaming," Portman’s legislation calls for the following provisions:

First, the formation of a new US agency called the Center for Information Analysis and Response spearheaded by the State Department with assistance from USAID. This agency is tasked with "exposing and countering foreign disinformation operations and proactively advancing ‘fact-based’ narratives that support US allies and interests."

The legislation presumes either that all "facts" will support US interests at all time or, conversely, restricts by law that only "facts" favorable to US interests may be presented.

Second, the creation of a fund to provide grants and contracts to NGOs, civil society organizations, think tanks, private sector companies, media organizations, and other experts tasked with creating adaptive and responsive US strategy options and integrating their expertise into the strategy-making process.

The legislation requires, under force of law and subsequent approval of grants, that reporting by BBG and affiliate media outlets to present stories from a "strategic" lens that is biased toward US interests.

Third, the legislation calls for increased "cultural and educational exchanges" with "special consideration to students and community leaders applying to State Department exchange programs from populations and countries heavily targeted by 'foreign disinformation and propaganda campaigns.'"

The concern posed here is that the measure calls for a program mirroring AIPAC’s (the American Israeli Political Action Committee) cultural exchanges with the US which require, as a predicate, adherence to a 'pro-Israeli' US foreign policy within the Middle East.

RT’s Response

In an opinion editorial Thursday, following the announcement of the proposed legislation, RT takes exception to Portman’s claim that the station’s Washington bureau alone spends $400 million per year, stating that this figure is not only false, but propaganda, noting that the total 2016 budget is $248 million for RT’s entire global operation.

RT criticized BBG’s primary outlet, Voice of America (VOA), for reporting Portman’s claimed figure of $400 million "without question and with no apparent fact checking." They go on to say that "Senator Portman, and the supposedly venerated news organization he seeks to aid, fight against ‘disinformation’ by starting off with a blatant lie."

The station notes that, despite working under a tighter budget than Senator Portman’s figure suggests, “RT boasts 70 million weekly TV viewers, nearly 50 million monthly unique visitors to their digital platform, and the status as the number one international TV news network on YouTube, with more than 3 billion views.”

What will be the ultimate impact of the legislation?  

Earl Rasmussen, Executive Vice President of the Eurasia Center, in an interview with Radio Sputnik, questioned whether the legislation violates the US First Amendment right of freedom of speech and the press. In addressing this point, Rasmussen noted that the open-ended manner in which the legislation was drafted means it can be used against any media outlet that opposes Washington’s views.

Rasmussen called the legislation "a little too extreme," based on his own readings. He also questioned whether the public interest would be better served by censoring or "delegitimizing" alternative news media outlets, even if foreign funded.

Rasmussen suggested that a better solution may be to just do what he does, "listen to about four different news channels from around the world every day to get a balanced perspective on the world."

Related:
Over 60% of Mexicans Do Not Want Trump to Become US President
Attorney General Drops Trump Fraud Case After Cash Contribution
Fox Cancels Presidential Debate After Trump, Kasich Decide to Pull Out
Trump's Juggernaut Rolls On, Democratic Machine Propels Clinton Forward
Tags:
U.S. Department of State, counter-propaganda, Russian propaganda, anti-Russian propaganda, propaganda war, propaganda, The United States Agency for International Development (USAID), RIA Novosti, Russia Today, Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Chris Murphy, Rob Portman, United States, Russia, World
Community standardsDiscussion
Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
  • Сomment

All comments

  • Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
    They don't even try to hide their non sense! "Losing the information war" no it's calling a fact a fact and you're in the wrong! Go Russian and Chinese Media!
  • michael
    it is a sign of their fear - and cancer like, it is consuming them.
  • karlof1
    The only reason to silence dissent is because you're going to act on doing what the dissent objects to while saying you're doing something else--promote war while calling it promoting peace. Or as we've all seen, oppose terrorism while being the planet's #1 terrorists.
  • Mitach2002
    Americans only have the illusion of constitutional freedoms, most don't realize that documents almost worthless now.
  • Mother Gorilla
    Highly disingeneous, since the US have so many more and powerful media companies than all other countries, including Russia and China.
  • FlorianGeyerin reply tomichael(Show commentHide comment)
    michael,

    I agree with you.
    The cancer of ' covetousness ' afflicts the majority of the US elite in all walks of life, particularly in politics. This type of mental cancer always leads to the demise of the societies that these incurable degenerates control.

    Death is inevitable for them and a blessing for all decent people.
  • michaelin reply toFlorianGeyer(Show commentHide comment)
    Florian yes, the only problem that 'we' have is that as they go / die they will take many with them...
  • FlorianGeyerin reply tomichael(Show commentHide comment)
    michael,

    The Western world in general has the same problems, all caused by human greed, particularly of the Elite's. For decades our governments have put on a false smile and sell us 'debt' to satisfy the peoples wants whilst they steal our countries wealth.

    Now that the government and bank ponzi schemes are failing the 'people' are finding out that they cannot support the debt today that they spent yesterday on frivolity.

    The elite's are now losing their false smiles and showing their snarling and bared teeth of avarice.
  • gondwana041
    RT and Sputnik are BS, They are writing tirelessly against Donald Trump who is very friendly to Russia. In same time you are taking propaganda from western MSM , for example columns from Economist magazine who is owned by Rotschilds
  • You must realize that Americans today are no different than Soviet-era Russians were in their day. The political and economic thinking of today's average American is shaped entirely by the propaganda interests of the owners and managers of the nation's banking and investment industries, who in turn have financial control all of America's video media industries -- the source for virtually ALL of today's American population's entertainment and U.S. news. Take CNN, for example. That nework can show with impunity a completely anti-Russia propaganda 'documentary' highlighting and dramatizing "Russian aircraft strafing and bombing anti-Assad troops in Syria, and bombing and destroying the troops, hospitals and churches and innocent civilians at the same time.". All it takes is one 'reporter' and one 'typical' person interviewed -- and the anti-Russia U.S./CNN propaganda damage is electronically implanted into the American viewers' mind -- just as pro-Soviet, anti-American, propaganda was similarly implanted in the average Russian listeners' mind during the days of Russian-language radio broadcasts of "Radio Moscow" and the Russian Information Agency of those long-ago Cold War years.
  • Porkbelly Porkerpig
    Okay, one obvious question I'd have to ask here, is what does RT-America's Washington Bureau, an English-language information pipeline, direct from VV-Putin's desk in the Kremlin, have to do with Russian Language stations from the US, broadcasting US Propaganda to Russians in Russia?

    These are two completely different media markets, in two completely different languages and in two completely different parts of the world. What do US government officials comments about English-language stations, broadcasting in the US from Russia, have to do with US sourced Russians language stations, broadcasting to Russians in Russia?

    Aren't these two completely different and unrelated things, here?
  • Alabama Mothman
    Trump and his supporters(me) have been saying this the whole time. Where have you people been?
Show new comments (0)
Top stories