20:57 GMT +329 August 2016
Live
Secretary of State John Kerry testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2016.

Kerry: US Discussing 'Plan B' in Case Syrian Diplomatic Efforts Fail

© AP Photo/ Susan Walsh
Politics
Get short URL
590927

The Obama administration is looking at additional options in Syria in the event the recently negotiated cessation of hostilities as well as political transition process do not succeed, US Secretary of State John Kerry told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Tuesday.

WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — On Monday, Russia and the United States announced an agreement on cessation of hostilities between the Syrian government of President Bashar Assad and the armed opposition factions had been reached. The agreement will come into force on February 27.

"There is a significant discussion taking place now about a Plan B in the event that we do not succeed at the [negotiating] table," Kerry said of the prospective ceasefire.

The ceasefire will include all parties engaged in the Syrian civil war, except for Daesh, al-Nusra Front and other organizations designated by the United Nations as terrorist.

Kerry explained that while he understands the formidable challenges ahead, "this is the moment to try to see whether or not we can make this work, not to find ways to preordain its failure."

Members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee pressed Kerry to elaborate on the consequences to a party that violates the prospective Syrian ceasefire.

The ISSG is a 17-member body, including Iran, Saudi Arabia and all the permanent members of the United National Security Council. The group previously negotiated a political transition process, including attempts to establish talks between the Syrian government and the country's opposition.

Related:
US May Review Refugee Assistance Budget if Funds Insufficient - Kerry
Kerry: UNSC Needs Russian-Backed Resolution to Settle Syrian Conflict
Kerry: Parties of Syrian Conflict Must 'Work Out' Modalities of Ceasefire
Tags:
ceasefire, John Kerry, United States, Syria
Community standardsDiscussion
Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
  • Сomment

All comments

  • Zhukov
    Ah, the Plan was Plan B all along- use Turkey and Saudi Arabia, then call for NATO.
  • dvdgrg09
    Plan A was for Assad to fall within weeks of the phony "uprising" featuring US al Qaeda in 2011. That didn't work, Plan B was to get him out by Geneva "negotiations" with Russia but the US realized it had no one to put up against him. Plan C was to sabotage the Geneva process and try to get him out via Ghouta false flag chemical attack set up by Turkey and failed cruise missile attack. Plan D was to invade with thousands of mercenaries via Turkey and Jordan, called "ISIL", but ISIL went out of control and complicated the plan. Then Russia stepped in and saved Damascus. Plan E was to set up a phony negotiation for a "transition" that would tie up Assad's forces and give space to rearm the losing guerrillas. Plan F may be to settle for a long term guerrilla war to continue wearing down the secular Syrian government until the psychos "win". The desired outcome is -- what? The generals and other hawks now want just to make Russia "feel real pain" for upsetting all those plans. They don't have a clue.

    Edited: I forgot Plan U, the coup in Ukraine; and Plan S, the sanctions to "make Putin change his ways", etc.
  • Plan B is a bad idea..
  • An empty threats to save face.. lol.!
Show new comments (0)