16:34 GMT +3 hours26 June 2016
Live
A general view shows the skyline of a central business district in Beijing

Beijing Sees Nothing Anti-Chinese in TPP Deal

© AFP 2016/ WANG ZHAO
Business
Get short URL
5114535

Commerce Minister Gao Hucheng said that Beijing did not consider the Trans-Pacific Partnership deal as contradicting China's interests.

BEIJING (Sputnik) — Beijing does not consider the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal to be directed against China, the country's Commerce Minister Gao Hucheng said Tuesday.

"We do not think that the TPP deal is directed against China. We also do not think that the TPP deal and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership [RCEP] contradict each other. I think they supplement each other," Gao said at a press conference.

According to the minister, the official text of the agreement has been completely translated into Chinese and some time is needed to analyze the deal.

Gao noted that China always positively regarded transparent regional free trade agreements.

In early February, the United States, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam signed the TPP agreement. Under the TPP deal, a free trade zone was established between these 12 nations that constitute 40 percent of the world’s GDP. The agreement is to be ratified by every participant.

The US President Barack Obama administration had noted previously that the TPP would allow the United States to write the rules of global trade in the 21st century.

Related:
US Invites Russia and China to Join TPP Deal - Kerry
Trump's Nightmare: China May Affect 'Horrible TPP Through Back Door'
China-Backed Pacific Deal May Be Hard to Reconcile With TPP - APEC Delegate
Chinese Businesses Want to See Beijing TPP Member – Delegate to APEC
Tags:
free trade, Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), Gao Hucheng, China
Community standardsDiscussion
Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
  • Сomment

All comments

  • Glamoureus
    TPP is just about allow big sharks eating smaller sharks. US buy out rest of the world with dollars that they print.

    Agree it's not a direct treath but once US bought everything they will create povertry and then outsource their industry to countries such as Philiphins, Burma etc
  • Glamoureus
    I've been thinking some about my comment above.

    So we (the world) are moving away from bipolar towards a multipolar word.
    I don't think the true shady rulers of US are stupid and I do believe they realize there's no turning back from multipolar.

    Everyone can see the multipolar world as countries as Turkey, Syria, Saudi starts to engage regional changes. You got India that got modern weapons and will resits attacks from any nation. Japan that tries to create an agenda of their own.

    So the multipolar world can but has not to be a path to war. And US knows that, hence introducing economical war is much more beneficial then geophysical. That is where TPP enters.

    So BRICKS and Russia needs to counter TPP that creates Bipolar Eonomical World to create a multipolar economical world.
  • Blackie
    Well China enjoy your GMO poison.
  • Glamoureus
    I've been thinking some about my comment above.

    So we (the world) are moving away from bipolar towards a multipolar word.
    I don't think the true shady rulers of US are stupid and I do believe they realize there's no turning back from multipolar.

    Everyone can see the multipolar world as countries as Turkey, Syria, Saudi starts to engage regional changes. You got India that got modern weapons and will resits attacks from any nation. Japan that tries to create an agenda of their own.

    So the multipolar world can but has not to be a path to war. And US knows that, hence introducing economical war is much more beneficial then geophysical. That is where TPP enters.

    So BRICKS and Russia needs to counter TPP that creates Bipolar Eonomical World to create a multipolar economical world.
  • austquest
    Corporate ‘America’ or China; which is the less Obnoxious & Abusive Debt Creator & Liability Shifter?

    TPP, et al; Corporate ‘America’ Desperate ‘Extortion’; Join in U.S. Increasing Avaricious $17+ trillion Debts/Plunder to harmless taxpayers, or, Scorched Earth, Global Depression?
    Is ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada, et al, ‘unnecessarily’ delaying the TPP, CETA, et al?

    There is no melodramatic ‘Boom, or, Bust’ in the TPP & the other Global
    Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements; it’s just a huge Shift of Liabilities from
    Corporations to the harmless lil’ guy and taking Huge amounts from the lil’ guy via Punitive Penalties ‘giving’ it to Shareholders as ‘Profits’;
    Tort Reform on Steroids is Tort Abolishment.
    “You’re either For ‘Us’, or, Against ‘Us’ “

    Corporate ‘America’ or China; which is the less Obnoxious & Abusive Debt Creator & Liability Shifter?

    * Introduction TPP, et al, base for future, secret changes for Global Corporate Economy; your tax dollars to fund their enterprises & value of shares with No Corporate Liabilities & for their other future considerations.

    * What happened to new Canadian PM Trudeau’s (Corporate Canada East) promise to read, understand, share his understanding of TPP with consultation & questions from the taxpayers? Have Trudeau & Freeland even read the TPP?

    * Should Politicians Have to Sully Their ‘Beliefs’ & Sales Pitches with ‘Sordid’ Facts that Come from Actually Reading & Understanding Global Treaties/’Arrangements’? Just the Facts; ‘We’, The People can Draw our Own Conclusions? Unless they’ve been paid via ‘future considerations’…
    2 Republican Senators Admit that They Have read the TPP.
    Congress/Parliaments; Deluded, or, Deluding; 'IGNORAMUS et IGNORABIMUS' (I do not know & I will Not Know)?
    ‘Quis custodiet ipsos custodies’? (Who Will Guard the Guards?)

    * Corporate America, after its 2008 ‘Tactical Probe’ into Deregulation & Its Sub sequential Buying Short on its Global Recession, is Anxious for Its Legitimized & Globalized (TPP/TTIP/CETA) ‘Full Invasion’; HSBC’s money laundering, Enron’s insider trading, Chase Bank’s fraud, etc.
    Corporate Canada & its Traditional Big 3 Political Parties are desperate to
    increase its play time under the ‘skirts’ of Corporate U.S. in the International
    Glitter Game.

    * TPP Costs harmless Taxpayers. Why not make Global Corporate Partners pay for ‘Privilege’ of joining TPP, et al & Corporations pay TPP Tribunal’s punitive penalties NOT the harmless taxpayers?

    * Do ‘We’ want ‘Good Corporate Citizens’, or, more of Corporate Global assocs. to Punish the harmless taxpayers & complete the Info Deprivation?

    * After New Zealand’s PM admitted that medicines will cost more, have the citizens of New Zealand & other TPP nations also noticed similar moves like Canadian Prime Minister Harper below? ‘To help pay for the harmless taxpayers ‘guilty transgressions’ against Global Corporations in Canada, Prime Minister Harper has recently cut the funding for health care by $36 billion dollars’. (please see article below)

    * There is a great deal more to the ‘Foreign’ Treaties/’Arrangements’ (TPP, CETA, TTIP, et al), than Tobacco Carve-out, Piggy-backing Autos & Parts from China to N. America &/or the EU via Japan, Gouging Drug Prices, Fish, IP, Privatizing Public Health Care, Dairy products & Pork;
    Why didn’t Someone Tell me that the Punitive Penalties of the TPP’s Tribunals would come off the Top of Signatory Governments’ Budgets & Not the Bottom after All other Expenditures? Corporations & Shareholders First and the lil’ guy gets left overs, if any.


    * Canada’s (US’s) Traditional Media (Corporate Canada, et al) seem to be Adjusting the TPP ‘Goal Posts’ in order to ‘Demonstrate’ how Canada Won more than it Lost & similarly in all of the other Traditional Media of the other TPP nations. How did ‘We’ all ‘Win’ if everyone else ’Lost’? Isn't more accurate that the Global Corporations WON BIG time & ALL the citizens of the Trans Pacific nations LOST BIG time?

    * Guaranteeing the Net Tax Gains for the Voters with Global Corporate Assets Defeats the Purpose of the Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’; ie. it’s like playing the ‘Shell’/Shill Game without Hiding the Pea.

    • Can Piggy-backing 80% of products from China, BRICS, et al, on to Canadian products exported to the U.S. really lower the taxes of Canadian citizens by 7% if Corporate Canada increases our Taxes (Global Corporate Tribunal Penalties) by 2- 12%+?

    • How long have Global Corporate Associates been ‘Passing’ Legislation in
    Anticipation of Suing Once Ratified? ‘Trickle’ Up & Out Economics.

    • But, will the lil' guy get 6 years to read, consider, discuss & improve upon (with lawyers paid by Global Corporate Assocs.)?
    ***
    FULL Article, see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
    ***
    Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 friends who will share it with 10 others...
Show new comments (0)
Top stories