16:11 GMT +3 hours28 June 2016
Live
Sergei Glazyev, Russian presidential adviser on regional economic integration, attending the Second Action Forum of the Russian Popular Front

Why are Liberal Economists Outraged by Putin Advisor's Reform Proposals?

© Sputnik/ Grigoriy Sisoev
Business
Get short URL
173898293

On Tuesday, economist Sergei Glazyev will submit a report to Russia's Security Council, offering his vision on how the country can overcome the effects of Western sanctions and return to economic growth. Last week, Glazyev's proposals leaked to the press, leading to a firestorm of criticism from Russia's liberal economists. Sputnik finds out why.

Sergei Glazyev, a Russian Ukrainian economist, politician, and specialist on the Eurasian Economic Union, will present his report to the Russian Security Council, a consultative body reporting to the Russian president charged with working out decisions on issues of national security, this Tuesday. His report, leaked to Russian business newspaper Kommersant last week, features a number of controversial, unconventional and decidedly anti-liberal proposals for dealing with the effects of Western sanctions, stabilizing the course of the ruble, and restoring economic growth.

The plan proposes a five-year 'road map' to Russia's economic sovereignty and long-term growth, and is ostensibly aimed at helping the country to avoid the 'stagflation trap' of economic stagnation and growing inflation. The plan is presented as being aimed toward building up the country's immunity to external shocks and foreign influence, and ultimately, toward bringing Russia out of the periphery and into the core of the global economic system.

The plan's ambitious goals include raising industrial output by 30-35 percent over a five year period, creating a socially-oriented 'knowledge economy' via the transfer of substantial economic resources to education, health care and the social sphere, the creation of instruments aimed at increasing savings as a percent of GDP, and a number of other initiatives, including a program aimed at transitioning to a sovereign monetary policy.

Controversially, the program proposes to use Central Bank resources to provide targeted lending for businesses and industries by providing them with low interest rates between 1-4 percent, made possible by quantitative easing to the tune of 20 trillion rubles over a five year period. The program also suggests that the state support private business through the creation of "reciprocal obligations" for the purchase of products and services at agreed-upon prices.

A section of the report on "stabilizing the ruble's exchange rate, the termination of capital flight and the de-dollarization of the economy" offers yet more controversial suggestions, proposing that the state "stop the speculative vortex" in the currency market via what effectively amounts to the introduction of capital controls, something which Russia's leadership has vehemently resisted even considering. The proposed measures include restrictions on companies' purchase of foreign currency for reasons other than transactions with foreign entities, along with a "temporary tax" on conversation operations, as well as restrictions on companies' export of capital, requiring firms to offer "reasoned justifications" for their activities in the transfer of capital abroad.

Another decidedly anti-liberal and arguably even anti-free market proposal in Glazyev's report is a section devoted to the "stabilization of prices," proposing a temporary freeze on prices for a basic basket of consumer goods, a 25 percent profit cap between producer and retail prices, as well as measures to stabilize the price of goods and services provided by state-controlled monopolies. The economist also proposes revoking the return of the VAT on the export of raw materials and resources to state companies, ostensibly aimed at stimulating the export of processed goods.

A section of the report on "the neutralization of the effects of anti-Russian sanctions" proposes converting the reserves of the Russian Central Bank, the Reserve Fund and the National Welfare Fund into gold and BRICS countries bonds, along with the creation of a new regional and international system of settlements in national currencies independent of the dollar. One proposal in particular from this section which caught the ire of critics was the suggestion that Russian companies be permitted to use force majeure to free themselves of obligations related to loan agreements provided in countries which have imposed financial sanctions against Russia.

The program is capped by a proposal to create a State Committee on Strategic Planning Under the President of the Russian Federation (GKSP), together with a State Committee for Scientific and Technological Development (GKNTR), ostensibly modeled on a system created in Iran during the 1990s following the introduction of Western sanctions on that country.

Program Hits a Nerve Among Russia's Liberal Economists

Upon leaking, Glazyev's proposal was hit with a wave of criticism from representatives of the liberal wing of Russia's economic policy elite, from the 'old guard' of market reformers such as Yevegni Yashin and Andrei Nechayev, to the new generation, including Konstantin Sonin, former Vice Rector of Moscow's Higher School of Economics. Observers criticized the economist's proposals for being an attempt to return the country to the Soviet model of development, with others saying that the program amounted to a proposal to turn the economy into one-part Argentina, one-part North Korea.

An recent op-ed in liberal English-language newspaper The Moscow Times slammed Glazyev's plan, saying that it amounted to "a compendium of lazy, irrational thinking that, were it ever put into practice, would quickly set Russia on a road to economic apocalypse."

And while 'shadow CIA' think tank Stratfor went on to suggest that Glazyev's plan meant that "the Kremlin is planning for the worst –the severing of ties with the West," the reality appears to be that the economist's ideas are being considered by the Russian government only as food for thought. Presidential press secretary Dmitri Peskov responded to the plan by pointing out that Glazyev's proposals "are treated as the point of view of an expert," adding that his views are far from always being "an expression of the official position of the president or the presidential administration."

So far, Glazyev's plan has merely stepped on some toes within Russia's economic policy establishment. Were it to be taken into serious consideration, it would doubtlessly come to threaten long-established economic and political interests, both in Russia and abroad, serving as a Pandora's box which the Russian leadership does not seem eager to open.

Related:
Economists Buried 2008 Crisis that Never Died, Now it Returns Full Force
Why Russia Keeps Oil Output as Global Prices Nosedive
Russian Budget Deficit for 2016 'Will Not Hurt Macro-Economic Stability'
Russia's Special Economic Zones First Step of Overall Economic Reforms
Russia's Economic Growth to Stand at 1-2% in 2016 - Minister
BRICS Bank to Boost Development of Bloc's International Partners
Tags:
advisor, political advisor, social benefits, health care, education, industrial growth, finance, banking, anti-Russian sanctions, economic growth, sanctions, economics, economic program, program, Russian Security Council, Sergei Glazyev, Russia
Community standardsDiscussion
Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
  • Сomment

All comments

  • cast235
    Sovereign currency? Is a great idea. As long as currency is between 60 to 120 to a dollar. Q Easing money could be used to develop industries, and proceeds used to offset inflation to 2%. Markets forced prices will help too. Not forever, just until control is established. Central bank MUST keep lowering rates. at least 1% more before year end all the way down to the lowest rate in the world. Then no need to control where money is borrowed from. Competition!! Q.E cash at the tune of that amount is great!!! central bank could raise it with a multiplier figure. As ugly as it sounds, Russia MUST get some assets back into the state. And lend money to Russian corporations abroad, for this the lowest rate is needed. EEU have development bank. Russia too. So building a copy of IMF and WB shouldn't hurt. there is plenty of need out there . Selling assets to west is NOT a great idea. While Russia get hurt with sanctions and get hate for just being Russia. Russia should begin the QE now. But at all time keep the Ruble at 60 to 120 to the dollar, and protecting the pensioners . They should get a full raise. So they can live well. This protectionism, will get Russia less dependent of west infrastructure. Plus Russia should denounce previous deals and treaties signed because they can only serve and are mentioned when is for western interests. Even salt comes to mind. Russia will thrive. and live well.
Show new comments (0)
Top stories